Neural Networks Enforcing Physical Symmetries in Nonlinear Dynamical Lattices: The Case Example of the Ablowitz-Ladik Model
Wei Zhu, Wesley Khademi, Efstathios G. Charalampidis, Panayotis G., Kevrekidis

TL;DR
This paper introduces symmetry-preserving neural networks tailored for nonlinear dynamical lattices, demonstrating their effectiveness in enforcing physical symmetries and conservation laws, especially in the Ablowitz-Ladik model with rogue wave solutions.
Contribution
The authors develop group-equivariant neural networks that enforce spatio-temporal symmetries and periodicity, improving upon standard PINNs in modeling nonlinear lattice solutions.
Findings
Superiority of S-PINNs over standard PINNs in accuracy and robustness.
Effective enforcement of physical symmetries and conservation laws.
Successful modeling of rogue wave solutions in the Ablowitz-Ladik model.
Abstract
In this work we introduce symmetry-preserving, physics-informed neural networks (S-PINNs) motivated by symmetries that are ubiquitous to solutions of nonlinear dynamical lattices. Although the use of PINNs have recently attracted much attention in data-driven discovery of solutions chiefly to partial differential equations, we demonstrate that they fail at enforcing important physical laws including symmetries of solutions and conservation laws. Through the correlation of parity symmetries in both space and time of solutions to differential equations with their group equivariant representation, we construct group-equivariant NNs which respect spatio-temporal parity symmetry. Moreover, we adapt the proposed architecture to enforce different types of periodicity (or localization) of solutions to nonlinear dynamical lattices. We do so by applying S-PINNs to the completely integrable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
