Combinatorial model categories are equivalent to presentable quasicategories
Dmitri Pavlov

TL;DR
This paper proves an equivalence between combinatorial model categories and presentable quasicategories, showing they are different models describing the same underlying (infinity,1)-category structures.
Contribution
It establishes a Dwyer-Kan equivalence linking combinatorial model categories and presentable quasicategories, unifying different frameworks for (infinity,1)-categories.
Findings
Combinatorial model categories are equivalent to presentable quasicategories.
Underlying quasicategories of these models are also equivalent.
Provides a unified understanding of models for (infinity,1)-categories.
Abstract
We establish a Dwyer-Kan equivalence of relative categories of combinatorial model categories, presentable quasicategories, and other models for locally presentable (infinity,1)-categories. This implies that the underlying quasicategories of these relative categories are also equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
