Peripherality in networks: theory and applications
Jesse Geneson, Shen-Fu Tsai

TL;DR
This paper explores measures of peripherality and centrality in networks, focusing on the Mostar index, refuting previous conjectures, correcting results, and applying these concepts to real-world chemical reaction graphs.
Contribution
It introduces new bounds, complexity results, and indices for measuring peripherality, and evaluates the Mostar index's effectiveness in different network contexts.
Findings
Refutes a conjecture on the maximum Mostar index of bipartite graphs.
Corrects a maximum terminal Mostar index value for trees, showing it is (n-1)(n-3).
Finds Mostar index aligns more with centrality than peripherality in chemical reaction graphs.
Abstract
We investigate several related measures of peripherality and centrality for vertices and edges in networks, including the Mostar index which was recently introduced as a measure of peripherality for both edges and networks. We refute a conjecture on the maximum possible Mostar index of bipartite graphs from (Do\v{s}li\'{c} et al, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 2018) and (Ali and Do\v{s}li\'{c}, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2021). We also correct a result from the latter paper, where they claimed that the maximum possible value of the terminal Mostar index among all trees of order is . We show that this maximum is for , and that it is only attained by the star. We asymptotically answer another problem on the maximum difference between the Mostar index and the irregularity of trees from (F. Gao et al, On the difference of Mostar index…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph theory and applications · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Complex Network Analysis Techniques
