Removing Interlopers From Intensity Mapping Probes Of Primordial Non-Gaussianity
Chang Chen, Anthony R. Pullen

TL;DR
Line intensity mapping can measure primordial non-Gaussianity with high precision, but foreground interlopers pose biases; cross-correlation techniques can significantly mitigate these effects.
Contribution
This paper models the impact of interloper lines on PNG measurements in LIM and demonstrates how cross-correlation methods can reduce systematic biases.
Findings
Interlopers can bias PNG constraints and cause false positives.
Cross-correlation reduces PNG error by factors of 2 to 6.
Joint auto- and cross-power spectra nearly eliminate interloper effects.
Abstract
Line intensity mapping (LIM) has the potential to produce highly precise measurements of scale-dependence bias from primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) due to its ability to map much larger volumes than are available from galaxy surveys. PNG parameterized by leads to a scale-dependent correction to the bias, and therefore a correction to the line intensity power spectrum. However, LIM experiences contamination from foreground emission, including interloping emission lines from other redshifts which alter the power spectra of the maps at these scales, potentially biasing measurements of . Here we model the effect of line interlopers on upcoming line intensity mapping probes of primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) from inflation. As an example, we consider the line at target redshift to probe PNG, with the important systematic concern being foreground…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
