Quantifying the COVID19 infection risk due to droplet/aerosol inhalation
Rahul Bale, Akiyoshi Iida, Masashi Yamakawa, ChungGang Li, Makoto, Tsubokura

TL;DR
This paper develops a framework to estimate COVID-19 infection risk from droplet dispersion simulations, incorporating virus transmissibility, vaccination effects, and environmental factors like humidity.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method to apply the dose-response model directly to numerical droplet dispersion simulations, accounting for variant transmissibility and vaccination.
Findings
Simulation shows humidity significantly affects infection risk.
The model effectively incorporates variant transmissibility and vaccination effects.
Droplet dispersion simulations provide spatial and temporal risk assessment.
Abstract
The dose-response model has been widely used for quantifying the risk of infection of airborne diseases like COVID-19. The model has been used in the room-average analysis of infection risk and analysis using passive scalars as a proxy for aerosol transport. However, it has not been employed for risk estimation in numerical simulations of droplet dispersion. In this work, we develop a framework for the evaluation of the probability of infection in droplet dispersion simulations using the dose-response model. We introduce a version of the model that can incorporate the higher transmissibility of variant strains of SARS-CoV2 and the effect of vaccination in evaluating the probability of infection. Numerical simulations of droplet dispersion during speech are carried out to investigate the infection risk over space and time using the model. The advantage of droplet dispersion simulations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInfection Control and Ventilation · COVID-19 epidemiological studies
