Quantum computational advantage attested by nonlocal games with the cyclic cluster state
Austin K. Daniel, Yinyue Zhu, C. Huerta Alderete, Vikas Buchemmavari,, Alaina M. Green, Nhung H. Nguyen, Tyler G. Thurtell, Andrew Zhao, Norbert M., Linke, Akimasa Miyake

TL;DR
This paper introduces Bell-type nonlocal games to demonstrate quantum advantage using cyclic cluster states, validated through experiments on a trapped-ion quantum computer, providing scalable benchmarks for quantum computing.
Contribution
It presents a novel set of nonlocal games that can unconditionally prove quantum advantage in a hardware-agnostic way, with experimental validation on a six-qubit system.
Findings
Fidelity of 60.6% before correction, 66.4% after correction.
Experimental results surpass classical Bell bounds, nearing depth-1 classical circuit limits.
Provides scalable benchmarks for pre-fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Abstract
We propose a set of Bell-type nonlocal games that can be used to prove an unconditional quantum advantage in an objective and hardware-agnostic manner. In these games, the circuit depth needed to prepare a cyclic cluster state and measure a subset of its Pauli stabilizers on a quantum computer is compared to that of classical Boolean circuits with the same, nearest-neighboring gate connectivity. Using a circuit-based trapped-ion quantum computer, we prepare and measure a six-qubit cyclic cluster state with an overall fidelity of 60.6% and 66.4%, before and after correcting for measurement-readout errors, respectively. Our experimental results indicate that while this fidelity readily passes conventional (or depth-0) Bell bounds for local hidden-variable models, it is on the cusp of demonstrating a higher probability of success than what is possible by depth-1 classical circuits. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
