On the Complexity of Triangle Counting using Emptiness Queries

TL;DR

This paper determines the query complexity for estimating triangles in graphs using BIS queries and establishes a lower bound for the Edge Emptiness oracle, advancing understanding of graph structure estimation.

Contribution

It completely resolves the query complexity for triangle estimation with BIS queries and proves a lower bound for the Edge Emptiness oracle.

Findings

Query complexity for triangle estimation with BIS is fully characterized.

Lower bound established for Edge Emptiness oracle testing graph connectivity.

Advances understanding of higher-order structure estimation in graphs.

Abstract

Beame et al. [ITCS 2018 & TALG 2021] introduced and used the Bipartite Independent Set (BIS) and Independent Set (IS) oracle access to an unknown, simple, unweighted and undirected graph and solved the edge estimation problem. The introduction of this oracle set forth a series of works in a short span of time that either solved open questions mentioned by Beame et al. or were generalizations of their work as in Dell and Lapinskas [STOC 2018], Dell, Lapinskas and Meeks [SODA 2020], Bhattacharya et al. [ISAAC 2019 & Theory Comput. Syst. 2021], and Chen et al. [SODA 2020]. Edge estimation using BIS can be done using polylogarithmic queries, while IS queries need sub-linear but more than polylogarithmic queries. Chen et al. improved Beame et al.'s upper bound result for edge estimation using IS and also showed an almost matching lower bound. Beame et al. in their introductory work asked a few open questions out of which one was on estimating structures of higher order than edges, like triangles and cliques, using BIS queries. In this work, we completely resolve the query complexity of estimating triangles using BIS oracle. While doing so, we prove a lower bound for an even stronger query oracle called Edge Emptiness (EE) oracle, recently introduced by Assadi, Chakrabarty and Khanna [ESA 2021] to test graph connectivity.