A pitfall in applying non-anticommuting $\gamma_5$ in $q\overline{q} \rightarrow ZH$ amplitudes
Taushif Ahmed

TL;DR
This paper reveals a critical issue when using non-anticommuting $\gamma_5$ in two-loop QCD calculations for $qar{q} o ZH$, showing it necessitates an extra operator in the Lagrangian, unlike the anticommuting case.
Contribution
It identifies a specific pitfall in applying non-anticommuting $\gamma_5$ in dimensional regularisation for Higgs production amplitudes, highlighting the need for an additional operator.
Findings
Non-anticommuting $\gamma_5$ requires an extra operator in the renormalized Lagrangian.
Anticommuting $\gamma_5$ does not require this amendment.
The discrepancy impacts calculations of $qar{q} o ZH$ amplitudes.
Abstract
In computing the two-loop QCD corrections to a class of Feynman diagrams for the process in Higgs effective field theory, we discover a striking phenomenon. We find the need for an additional local composite operator in the renormalised Lagrangian while employing a non-anticommuting in dimensional regularisation. The computation using anticommuting , however, does not require any such amendment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
