
TL;DR
This paper studies the minimum vertex set size needed to eliminate certain subgraphs in connected graphs, improving existing bounds and providing sharp results for various graph families.
Contribution
It refines bounds on vertex removal sets for eliminating edges, cycles, and specific subgraphs, extending previous results with new sharp bounds.
Findings
Bound of n/3 for vertex sets removing edges, except for a 5-cycle.
Improved bound of n/4 for removing cycles, excluding triangles and 7-cycles.
New bound involving (4n - r)/14 for removing edges, with sharpness proven.
Abstract
For a connected -vertex graph and a set of graphs, let denote the size of a smallest set of vertices of such that the graph obtained from by deleting the closed neighbourhood of contains no graph in . Let denote the set of connected graphs that have at least edges. By a result of Caro and Hansberg, if and is not a -cycle. The author recently showed that if is not a triangle and is the set of cycles, then . We improve this result by showing that if is neither a triangle nor a -cycle. Let be the number of vertices of that have only one neighbour. We determine a set of six graphs such that if …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Graph theory and applications
