3D template-based $Fermi$-LAT constraints on the diffuse supernova axion-like particle background
Francesca Calore, Pierluca Carenza, Christopher Eckner, Tobias, Fischer, Maurizio Giannotti, Joerg Jaeckel, Kei Kotake, Takami Kuroda,, Alessandro Mirizzi, Francesco Sivo

TL;DR
This study uses 12 years of Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data and detailed supernova models to set new constraints on axion-like particles, considering their production in supernovae and conversion into gamma rays in the Milky Way's magnetic field.
Contribution
It introduces an improved modeling of supernova-produced ALPs, including failed supernovae, and applies a template-based analysis to gamma-ray data to constrain ALP-photon coupling.
Findings
Set an upper limit of g_{aγ} ≲ 3.76×10^{-11} GeV^{-1} for m_a ≪ 10^{-11} eV
Slightly improves the CAST bound on ALPs
Constraints are within a factor of six of the SN1987A gamma-ray burst limit
Abstract
Axion-like particles (ALPs) may be abundantly produced in core-collapse (CC) supernovae (SNe), hence the cumulative signal from all past SN events can create a diffuse flux peaked at energies of about 25~MeV. We improve upon the modeling of the ALPs flux by including a set of CC SN models with different progenitor masses, as well as the effects of failed CC SNe -- which yield the formation of black holes instead of explosions. Relying on the coupling strength of ALPs to photons and the related Primakoff process, the diffuse SN ALP flux is converted into gamma rays while traversing the magnetic field of the Milky Way. The spatial morphology of this signal is expected to follow the shape of the Galactic magnetic field lines. We make use of this via a template-based analysis that utilizes 12 years of -LAT data in the energy range from 50 MeV to 500 GeV. In our benchmark case of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
