The Pantheon+ Analysis: Dependence of Cosmological Constraints on Photometric-Zeropoint Uncertainties of Supernova Surveys
Sasha Brownsberger, Dillon Brout, Daniel Scolnic, Christopher W., Stubbs, Adam G. Riess

TL;DR
This study assesses how uncertainties in photometric calibration across multiple supernova surveys impact the precision of cosmological parameters, finding H$_0$ measurements are robust while $\
Contribution
It introduces a systematic analysis of inter-survey calibration effects on cosmological constraints, highlighting the robustness of H$_0$ measurements and the sensitivity of $\
Findings
H$_0$ measurement is robust against calibration errors.
Uncertainties in $\
Calibration errors could cause small shifts in $\
Abstract
Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) measurements of the Hubble constant, H, the cosmological mass density, , and the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, , rely on numerous SNe surveys using distinct photometric systems across three decades of observation. Here, we determine the sensitivities of the upcoming SH0ES+Pantheon+ constraints on H, , and to unknown systematics in the relative photometric zeropoint calibration between the 17 surveys that comprise the Pantheon+ supernovae data set. Varying the zeropoints of these surveys simultaneously with the cosmological parameters, we determine that the SH0ES+Pantheon+ measurement of H is robust against inter-survey photometric miscalibration, but that the measurements of and are not. Specifically, we find that miscalibrated inter-survey systematics could represent a source of uncertainty in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
