Evidence for the preferential disruption of moderately massive stars by supermassive black holes
Brenna Mockler, Angela A. Twum, Katie Auchettl, Sierra Dodd, K.D., French, Jamie A.P. Law-Smith, Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz

TL;DR
This study uses spectral analysis of tidal disruption events to show that supermassive black holes preferentially disrupt moderately massive stars, indicating a bias towards higher mass stars in the stellar populations near SMBHs.
Contribution
It provides evidence that SMBHs tend to disrupt stars with masses around 1-2 solar masses, revealing a bias towards higher mass stars in the disruption events compared to the general stellar population.
Findings
Moderately massive stars ($ 1-2 M_\u00b0$) are preferentially disrupted.
Disruption of these stars is over-represented by a factor of 100.
Results suggest ongoing top-heavy star formation or dynamical mechanisms favoring higher mass stars near SMBHs.
Abstract
Tidal disruption events (TDEs) provide a unique opportunity to probe the stellar populations around supermassive black holes (SMBHs). By combining light curve modeling with spectral line information and knowledge about the stellar populations in the host galaxies, we are able to constrain the properties of the disrupted star for three TDEs. The TDEs in our sample have UV spectra, and measurements of the UV N III to C III line ratios enabled estimates of the nitrogen-to-carbon abundance ratios for these events. We show that the measured nitrogen line widths are consistent with originating from the disrupted stellar material dispersed by the central SMBH. We find that these nitrogen-to-carbon abundance ratios necessitate the disruption of moderately massive stars (). We determine that these moderately massive disruptions are over-represented by a factor of $\gtrsim…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
