Connectivity Concepts in Neuronal Network Modeling
Johanna Senk, Birgit Kriener, Mikael Djurfeldt, Nicole Voges, Han-Jia, Jiang, Lisa Sch\"uttler, Gabriele Gramelsberger, Markus Diesmann, Hans E., Plesser, Sacha J. van Albada

TL;DR
This paper reviews current neuronal network connectivity descriptions, identifies ambiguities, and proposes standardized, comprehensive concepts and graphical notations to improve clarity, reproducibility, and implementation in computational neuroscience.
Contribution
It introduces a set of standardized connectivity concepts and a unified graphical notation to enhance clarity and reproducibility in neuronal network modeling.
Findings
Many published connectivity descriptions are ambiguous
Proposed standardized connectivity concepts for deterministic and probabilistic networks
Introduced a unified graphical notation for network diagrams
Abstract
Sustainable research on computational models of neuronal networks requires published models to be understandable, reproducible, and extendable. Missing details or ambiguities about mathematical concepts and assumptions, algorithmic implementations, or parameterizations hinder progress. Such flaws are unfortunately frequent and one reason is a lack of readily applicable standards and tools for model description. Our work aims to advance complete and concise descriptions of network connectivity but also to guide the implementation of connection routines in simulation software and neuromorphic hardware systems. We first review models made available by the computational neuroscience community in the repositories ModelDB and Open Source Brain, and investigate the corresponding connectivity structures and their descriptions in both manuscript and code. The review comprises the connectivity of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
