Beware the Gini Index! A New Inequality Measure
Sabiou Inoua

TL;DR
The paper introduces a new inequality measure based on variance normalized by the second moment, addressing Gini index limitations for heavy-tailed distributions and satisfying key axioms.
Contribution
It proposes an alternative inequality index that is more reliable for heavy-tailed distributions and satisfies normative axioms, unlike the Gini index.
Findings
The new index is more stable for infinite-variance distributions.
It satisfies normative axioms including decomposability.
It outperforms the Gini index in heavy-tailed scenarios.
Abstract
The Gini index underestimates inequality for heavy-tailed distributions: for example, a Pareto distribution with exponent 1.5 (which has infinite variance) has the same Gini index as any exponential distribution (a mere 0.5). This is because the Gini index is relatively robust to extreme observations: while a statistic's robustness to extremes is desirable for data potentially distorted by outliers, it is misleading for heavy-tailed distributions, which inherently exhibit extremes. We propose an alternative inequality index: the variance normalized by the second moment. This ratio is more stable (hence more reliable) for large samples from an infinite-variance distribution than the Gini index paradoxically. Moreover, the new index satisfies the normative axioms of inequality measurement; notably, it is decomposable into inequality within and between subgroups, unlike the Gini index.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIncome, Poverty, and Inequality · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
