Comparative case study of two methods to assess the eruptive potential of selected active regions
Francesca Zuccarello, Ilaria Ermolli, Marianna B. Korsos, Fabrizio, Giorgi, Salvo L. Guglielmino, Robertus Erdelyi, Paolo Romano

TL;DR
This study compares two methods for assessing the eruptive potential of solar active regions, highlighting their complementary strengths and suggesting combined use for better flare prediction.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of magnetic and fractal methods to evaluate active region eruptive potential, demonstrating their combined effectiveness.
Findings
Methods complement each other in predicting flare activity.
Combined approach improves identification of eruptive active regions.
Analysis based on SDO data from 2011-2013.
Abstract
Solar eruptive events, like flares and coronal mass ejections, are characterized by the rapid release of energy that can give rise to emission of radiation across the entire electromagnetic spectrum and to an abrupt significant increase in the kinetic energy of particles. These energetic phenomena can have important effects on the Space Weather conditions and therefore it is necessary to understand their origin, in particular, what is the eruptive potential of an active region (AR). In these case studies, we compare two distinct methods that were used in previous works to investigate the variations of some characteristic physical parameters during the pre-flare states of flaring ARs. These methods consider: i) the magnetic flux evolution and the magnetic helicity accumulation, and ii) the fractal and multi-fractal properties of flux concentrations in ARs. Our comparative analysis is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
