Passivity-Based Decentralized Criteria for Small-Signal Stability of Power Systems with Converter-Interfaced Generation

TL;DR

This paper introduces new passivity-based criteria at different frequency ranges for ensuring small-signal stability in power systems with converter-interfaced generation, addressing limitations of traditional passivity methods.

Contribution

It proposes frequency-dependent admittance criteria and an alternative transfer function for stability analysis, accommodating active control strategies that violate low-frequency passivity.

Findings

Criteria are verifiable through frequency response analysis.

The approach separates low and high-frequency stability analysis.

It enhances local stability assessment for converter-interfaced devices.

Abstract

With the increasing penetration of converter-interfaced distributed generation systems, it would be advantageous to specify local compliance criteria for these devices to ensure the small-signal stability of the interconnected system. Passivity of the device admittance, which is an example of a local criterion, has been used previously to avoid resonances between these devices and the lightly damped oscillatory modes of the network. Typical active and reactive power control strategies like droop control and virtual synchronous generator control inherently violate the passivity constraints on admittance at low frequencies, although this does not necessarily mean that the interconnected system will be unstable. Therefore, passivity of the admittance is unsuitable as a stability criterion for devices that are represented by their wide-band models. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes the use of criteria based on admittance at higher frequencies and an alternative transfer function at lower frequencies. The alternative representation uses active and reactive power and the derivatives of the polar components of voltage as interface variables. To allow for the separate analysis at low and high frequencies, the device dynamics should exhibit a slow-fast separation; this is proposed as an additional constraint. Adherence to the proposed criteria is not onerous and is easily verifiable through frequency response analysis.