TL;DR
This paper explores the electrical and electromagnetic responses of steel-cased wells, highlighting their impact on geophysical imaging for monitoring applications like carbon storage and hydraulic fracturing.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the physics involved in grounded source and time-domain EM methods in the presence of steel-cased wells, including modeling challenges and potential for target detection.
Findings
Steel-cased wells channel charges and currents, aiding target detection.
EM responses involve complex multiple current systems and magnetic effects.
Time-domain EM offers rich data sensitive to subsurface targets.
Abstract
Electrical and electromagnetic (EM) methods can be diagnostic geophysical imaging tools for monitoring applications, such as carbon capture and storage or hydraulic fracturing. In these settings, it is common that steel-cased wells and other steel infrastructure are present. Grounded source methods, which use electrodes to inject current into the earth are of interest for casing integrity and monitoring applications. Electrostatic, or direct current (DC) resistivity, experiments form the basis of our understanding of the physics of grounded source experiments in terms of charges, currents, and electric fields. Steel-cased wells are highly conductive and although their presence makes numerical modelling more challenging, they can help targets of interest be detected because they channel charges and currents to depth. Time-domain EM experiments use a time-varying transmitter current.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
