Making Things Explainable vs Explaining: Requirements and Challenges under the GDPR
Francesco Sovrano, Fabio Vitali, Monica Palmirani

TL;DR
This paper discusses the limitations of current explainable AI approaches under GDPR and proposes a user-centered explanatory AI framework that enables interactive, tailored explanations for automated decision-making systems.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of explanatorY AI (YAI) as an extension of XAI, focusing on organizing explanations into user-centered narratives for better compliance and understanding.
Findings
Current XAI approaches are insufficient for GDPR requirements.
YAI enables interactive, personalized explanations for users.
The proposed framework improves user engagement with AI explanations.
Abstract
The European Union (EU) through the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI-HLEG) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has recently posed an interesting challenge to the eXplainable AI (XAI) community, by demanding a more user-centred approach to explain Automated Decision-Making systems (ADMs). Looking at the relevant literature, XAI is currently focused on producing explainable software and explanations that generally follow an approach we could term One-Size-Fits-All, that is unable to meet a requirement of centring on user needs. One of the causes of this limit is the belief that making things explainable alone is enough to have pragmatic explanations. Thus, insisting on a clear separation between explainabilty (something that can be explained) and explanations, we point to explanatorY AI (YAI) as an alternative and more powerful approach to win the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
