TL;DR
This paper compares different models for secondary particle spectra in proton-proton collisions, highlighting significant differences and emphasizing the importance of accurate modeling for multi-messenger astronomy, while introducing a new Python package for spectra calculations.
Contribution
It evaluates and compares predictions of secondary spectra from multiple models, endorses the QGSJET-II-04m model based on LHCf data, and introduces the aafragpy Python package for spectrum calculations.
Findings
Differences in photon spectra normalization reach 20-50% at intermediate energies.
Neutrino spectra differences are even larger than photon spectra.
The aafragpy package provides accessible secondary spectra for energies above 4 GeV.
Abstract
We compare the predictions of AAfrag for the spectra of secondary photons, neutrinos, electrons, and positrons produced in proton-proton collisions to those of the parameterisations of Kamae et al., Kelner et al., and Kafexhiu et al. We find that the differences in the normalisation of the photon energy spectra reach 2050% at intermediate values of the transferred energy fraction , growing up to a factor of two for 1, while the differences in the neutrino spectra are even larger. We argue that LHCf results on the forward production of photons favor the use of the QGSJET-II-04m model on which AAfrag is based. The differences in the normalisation have important implications in the context of multi-messenger astronomy, in particular, for the prediction of neutrino fluxes based on gamma-ray flux measurements, or regarding the inference of the cosmic ray spectrum, based…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
