What should be the ontology for the Standard Model?
Ding Jia

TL;DR
This paper discusses an alternative particle-string ontology for the Standard Model, which offers intuitive explanations for gauge symmetry and reduces redundant configurations compared to the traditional field formulation.
Contribution
It introduces a particle-string formulation of the Standard Model, providing a more intuitive and economical ontology that clarifies gauge symmetry and simplifies the theoretical framework.
Findings
Particle-string formulation offers an intuitive explanation for gauge symmetry.
This formulation reduces redundant path integral configurations.
It may be preferred over the traditional field ontology for the Standard Model.
Abstract
Although the Standard Model of particle physics is usually formulated in terms of fields, it can be equivalently formulated in terms of particles and strings. In this picture particles and open strings are always coupled. This offers an intuitive and graphical explanation for the otherwise mysterious gauge symmetry. In addition, the particle-string formulation avoids introducing redundant path integral configurations that are present in the field formulation. For its explanatory power and economy, the particle-string ontology may be preferred over the field ontology for the Standard Model.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
