The case for the Humanities Citation Index (HuCI): a citation index by the humanities, for the humanities
Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni, Matteo Romanello

TL;DR
The paper advocates for creating an open, comprehensive citation index tailored to humanities scholarship, emphasizing its benefits for research retrieval, interlinking collections, standardization, and bibliometric research.
Contribution
It proposes specific requirements and a collaborative infrastructure for developing the Humanities Citation Index (HuCI), filling a gap in existing citation tools.
Findings
Open citation index would improve humanities research retrieval
It would enable linking across repositories and collections
The index would support metadata standards and bibliometric research
Abstract
Citation indexes are by now part of the research infrastructure in use by most scientists: a necessary tool in order to cope with the increasing amounts of scientific literature being published. Commercial citation indexes are designed for the sciences and have uneven coverage and unsatisfactory characteristics for humanities scholars, while no comprehensive citation index is published by a public organization. We argue that an open citation index for the humanities is desirable, for four reasons: it would greatly improve and accelerate the retrieval of sources, it would offer a way to interlink collections across repositories (such as archives and libraries), it would foster the adoption of metadata standards and best practices by all stakeholders (including publishers) and it would contribute research data to fields such as bibliometrics and science studies. We also suggest that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies
