Psychological Safety in Agile Software Development Teams: Work Design Antecedents and Performance Consequences
Marte Pettersen Buvik, Anastasiia Tkalich

TL;DR
This study investigates how work design factors like autonomy influence psychological safety in agile software teams and how this safety impacts team reflexivity and performance, based on survey data from Norwegian teams.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence linking work design characteristics to psychological safety and team performance in agile software development.
Findings
Autonomy increases psychological safety.
Psychological safety positively affects team reflexivity.
Psychological safety directly improves team performance.
Abstract
Psychological safety has been postulated as a key factor for the success of agile software development teams, yet there is a lack of empirical studies investigating the role of psychological safety in this context. The present study examines how work design characteristics of software development teams (autonomy, task interdependence, and role clarity) influence psychological safety and, further, how psychological safety impacts team performance, either directly or indirectly through team reflexivity. We test our model using survey data from 236 team members in 43 software development teams in Norway. Our results show that autonomy boosts psychological safety in software teams, and that psychological safety again has a positive effect on team reflexivity and a direct effect on team performance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
