The structure of digraphs with excess one

TL;DR

This paper investigates the structure and non-existence of certain minimal $k$-geodetic digraphs with excess one, providing new constraints and closing open cases for specific degrees and diameters.

Contribution

It constrains the possible structures of minimal counterexamples and proves non-existence results for digraphs with excess one in several cases, advancing the understanding of digraph bounds.

Findings

Proves non-existence of certain degree-3 digraphs with excess one.

Closes open cases for $k=2$ and degrees 3 to 7.

Shows no involutary digraphs with excess one exist.

Abstract

A digraph $G$ is \emph{$k$-geodetic} if for any (not necessarily distinct) vertices $u,v$ there is at most one directed walk from $u$ to $v$ with length not exceeding $k$. The order of a $k$-geodetic digraph with minimum out-degree $d$ is bounded below by the directed Moore bound $M(d,k) = 1+d+d^2+\dots +d^k$. The Moore bound can be met only in the trivial cases $d = 1$ and $k = 1$, so it is of interest to look for $k$-geodetic digraphs with out-degree $d$ and smallest possible order $M(d,k)+\epsilon $, where $\epsilon $ is the \emph{excess} of the digraph. Miller, Miret and Sillasen recently ruled out the existence of digraphs with excess one for $k = 3,4$ and $d \geq 2$ and for $k = 2$ and $d \geq 8$. We conjecture that there are no digraphs with excess one for $d,k \geq 2$ and in this paper we investigate the structure of minimal counterexamples to this conjecture. We severely constrain the possible structures of the outlier function and prove the non-existence of certain digraphs with degree three and excess one, as well closing the open cases $k = 2$ and $d = 3,4,5,6,7$ left by the analysis of Miller et al. We further show that there are no involutary digraphs with excess one, i.e. the outlier function of any such digraph must contain a cycle of length $\geq 3$.