X-ray signature of antistars in the Galaxy
A.E. Bondar (Budker INP), S.I. Blinnikov (ITEP), A.M. Bykov (Ioffe, PTI), A.D. Dolgov (Novosibirsk University), K.A. Postnov (Sternberg, Astronomical Institute)

TL;DR
This paper proposes that antistars in the galaxy could be detected through specific narrow X-ray emission lines resulting from atomic cascades prior to matter-antimatter annihilation, which can be observed by upcoming X-ray missions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method to identify antistars via characteristic X-ray lines from excited antiproton and antihelium atoms, expanding search strategies beyond gamma-ray observations.
Findings
Identification of key X-ray lines (1.73 keV, 4.86 keV, 11.13 keV) associated with antistars.
Potential detectability of these lines with upcoming X-ray missions like XRISM, Athena, Lynx, and eROSITA.
Provides observational targets for future searches of antimatter objects in the galaxy.
Abstract
The existence of macroscopic objects from antimatter (antistars) is envisaged in some models of baryogenesis. Searches for antistars has been usually carried out in gamma-rays through hadronic annihilation of matter. In astrophysically plausible cases of the interaction of neutral atmospheres or winds from antistars with ionized interstellar gas, the hadronic annihilation will be preceded by the formation of excited and He atoms. These atoms rapidly cascade down to low levels prior to annihilation giving rise to a series of narrow lines which can be associated with the hadronic annihilation gamma-ray emission. The most significant are L (3p-2p) 1.73 keV line (yield more than 90\%) from atoms, and M (4-3) 4.86 keV (yield ) and L (3-2) 11.13 keV (yield about 25\%) lines from He atoms. These lines can be probed in dedicated observations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
