TL;DR
This paper identifies and corrects errors in existing methods for imputing censored covariates, demonstrating the impact on statistical inference and providing a practical R package for improved analysis.
Contribution
It derives the correct formula for conditional mean imputation of censored covariates and shows how previous formulas lead to bias, offering a new software tool for researchers.
Findings
Incorrect formulas cause bias in parameter estimates.
Corrected formula improves imputation accuracy.
Software package facilitates implementation of the new method.
Abstract
Analysts are often confronted with censoring, wherein some variables are not observed at their true value, but rather at a value that is known to fall above or below that truth. While much attention has been given to the analysis of censored outcomes, contemporary focus has shifted to censored covariates, as well. Missing data is often overcome using multiple imputation, which leverages the entire dataset by replacing missing values with informed placeholders, and this method can be modified for censored data by also incorporating partial information from censored values. One such modification involves replacing censored covariates with their conditional means given other fully observed information, such as the censored value or additional covariates. So-called conditional mean imputation approaches were proposed for censored covariates in Atem et al. [2017], Atem et al.[2019a], and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
