Punctured Low-Bias Codes Behave Like Random Linear Codes
Venkatesan Guruswami, Jonathan Mosheiff

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that low-bias punctured codes can replicate the properties of random linear codes, enabling derandomization and structural advantages while maintaining optimal error-correcting performance.
Contribution
It introduces a derandomization technique for random linear codes using low-bias puncturings, preserving key properties like list-decodability and capacity achievement.
Findings
Low-bias punctured codes match RLC list-decodability bounds.
Codes with large distance suffice for derandomization over large alphabets.
Punctured codes emulate RLC behavior on stochastic channels.
Abstract
Random linear codes are a workhorse in coding theory, and are used to show the existence of codes with the best known or even near-optimal trade-offs in many noise models. However, they have little structure besides linearity, and are not amenable to tractable error-correction algorithms. In this work, we prove a general derandomization result applicable to random linear codes. Namely, in settings where the coding-theoretic property of interest is "local" (in the sense of forbidding certain bad configurations involving few vectors -- code distance and list-decodability being notable examples), one can replace random linear codes (RLCs) with a significantly derandomized variant with essentially no loss in parameters. Specifically, instead of randomly sampling coordinates of the (long) Hadamard code (which is an equivalent way to describe RLCs), one can randomly sample coordinates of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
