Non-Salem sets in metric Diophantine approximation
Kyle Hambrook, Han Yu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of well approximable and badly approximable sets in higher dimensions, showing they are generally not Salem sets, contrasting with classical one-dimensional results.
Contribution
It demonstrates that in dimensions two and higher, well approximable and badly approximable sets do not exhibit Salem set properties, unlike the classical one-dimensional case.
Findings
Well approximable sets in higher dimensions are not Salem sets.
Badly approximable vectors in higher dimensions are not Salem.
Contrasts classical one-dimensional Salem set results.
Abstract
A classical result of Kaufman states that, for each the set of well approximable numbers \[ E(\tau)=\{x\in\mathbb{R}: \|qx\| < |q|^{-\tau} \text{ for infinitely many integers q}\} \] is a Salem set with Hausdorff dimension . A natural question to ask is whether the same phenomena holds for well approximable vectors in We prove that this is in general not the case. In addition, we also show that in the set of badly approximable vectors is not Salem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
