Observation of metallic electronic structure in a single-atomic-layer oxide
Byungmin Sohn, Jeong Rae Kim, Choong H. Kim, Sangmin Lee, Sungsoo, Hahn, Younsik Kim, Soonsang Huh, Donghan Kim, Youngdo Kim, Wonshik Kyung,, Minsoo Kim, Miyoung Kim, Tae Won Noh, Changyoung Kim

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that a monolayer of SrRuO3 exhibits a strongly correlated metallic phase with tunable electronic properties, challenging the typical insulating behavior of single-atomic-layer transition metal oxides.
Contribution
It provides the first evidence of a metallic phase in monolayer SrRuO3 and explores the interplay of dimensionality and electronic correlation in two-dimensional oxides.
Findings
Monolayer SrRuO3 is a strongly correlated metal.
Charge modulation induces an incoherent-to-coherent crossover.
The electronic phase is highly tunable via charge modulation.
Abstract
Correlated electrons in transition metal oxides (TMOs) exhibit a variety of emergent phases. When TMOs are confined to a single-atomic-layer thickness, experiments so far have shown that they usually lose diverse properties and become insulators. In an attempt to extend the range of electronic phases of the single-atomic-layer oxide, we search for a metallic phase in a monolayer-thick epitaxial SrRuO film. Combining atomic-scale epitaxy and angle-resolved photoemission measurements, we show that the monolayer SrRuO is a strongly correlated metal. Systematic investigation reveals that the interplay between dimensionality and electronic correlation makes the monolayer SrRuO an incoherent metal with orbital-selective correlation. Furthermore, the unique electronic phase of the monolayer SrRuO is found to be highly tunable, as charge modulation demonstrates an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
