Two-loop application of the Breitenlohner-Maison/'t Hooft-Veltman scheme with non-anticommuting $\gamma_5$: Full renormalization and symmetry-restoring counterterms in an abelian chiral gauge theory
Herm\`es B\'elusca-Ma\"ito, Amon Ilakovac, Paul K\"uhler, Marija, Ma{\dj}or-Bo\v{z}inovi\'c, Dominik St\"ockinger

TL;DR
This paper extends the application of the Breitenlohner-Maison/'t Hooft-Veltman scheme with non-anticommuting $ ext{γ}_5$ to two-loop calculations in an abelian chiral gauge theory, identifying symmetry-restoring counterterms and UV divergences.
Contribution
It provides the full two-loop structure of symmetry-restoring counterterms and demonstrates a methodology applicable to nonabelian gauge theories.
Findings
Symmetry-restoring counterterms at two loops have the same structure as at one loop.
Ultraviolet divergences cannot be fully canceled by standard counterterms.
Identified UV divergent evanescent counterterms necessary for renormalization.
Abstract
We apply the BMHV scheme for non-anticommuting to an abelian chiral gauge theory at the two-loop level. As our main result, we determine the full structure of symmetry-restoring counterterms up to the two-loop level. These counterterms turn out to have the same structure as at the one-loop level and a simple interpretation in terms of restoration of well-known Ward identities. In addition, we show that the ultraviolet divergences cannot be canceled completely by counterterms generated by field and parameter renormalization, and we determine needed UV divergent evanescent counterterms. The paper establishes the two-loop methodology based on the quantum action principle and direct computations of Slavnov-Taylor identity breakings. The same method will be applicable to nonabelian gauge theories.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
