Can one predict a drop contact angle?
Marion Silvestrini, Antonio Tinti, Alberto Giacomello, Carolina, Brito

TL;DR
This paper combines Monte Carlo simulation and the string method to analyze the free energy landscape of droplets on rough surfaces, aiming to predict contact angles and understand wetting states beyond classical models.
Contribution
It introduces a predictive scheme using advanced simulations to characterize wetting states and contact angles on heterogeneous surfaces, addressing limitations of traditional models.
Findings
Only one free energy minimum corresponds to superhydrophobic wetting.
Multiple minima can exist in the wet state on certain surfaces.
Decreasing surface roughness increases local minima in free energy profile.
Abstract
The study of wetting phenomena is of great interest due to the multifaceted technological applications of hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. The theoretical approaches proposed by Wenzel and later by Cassie and Baxter to describe the behaviour of a droplet of water on a rough solid were extensively used and improved to characterize the apparent contact angle of a droplet. However, the equilibrium hypothesis implied in these models means that they are not always predictive of experimental contact angles due to strong metastabilities typically occurring on heterogeneous surfaces. A predictive scheme for contact angle is thus urgently needed both to characterise a surface by contact angle measurements and to design superhydrophobic and oleophobic surfaces with the desired properties, e.g., contact angle hysteresis. In this work a combination of Monte Carlo simulation and the string…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
