Optimizing low-energy anti-fibrillation pacing: Lessons from a cellular automaton model
Noah DeTal, Flavio Fenton

TL;DR
This paper uses a cellular automaton model to understand low-energy defibrillation, revealing an optimal pacing period from competing effects and proposing a feedback scheme that improves shock timing.
Contribution
It introduces a topologically motivated feedback scheme for LEAP that outperforms traditional methods and clarifies the origin of the optimal pacing period.
Findings
Optimal pacing period results from competing effects, not resonance.
A feedback scheme improves shock timing over traditional LEAP.
Model's topological features align with realistic experimental observations.
Abstract
The essential features of far-field low-energy defibrillation are elucidated using a simple cellular automaton model of excitable media. The model's topological character allows for direct correspondence with both realistic models and experiment. An optimal pacing period is shown to arise from the competition between two effects, and not a resonant response as was previously hypothesized. Finally, a topologically motivated feedback scheme is presented that outperforms traditional LEAP by identifying optimal shock timings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeurological disorders and treatments · Neural dynamics and brain function · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
