Decentralized Learning of Tree-Structured Gaussian Graphical Models from Noisy Data

TL;DR

This paper presents a decentralized approach for learning tree-structured Gaussian graphical models from noisy data, improving sample complexity bounds and validating results through simulations.

Contribution

It introduces a new theoretical analysis for decentralized GGM learning under noise, reducing sample size requirements and removing certain assumptions from prior work.

Findings

Sample complexity for Gaussian channels is reduced to O(log(d/δ))

The proposed method outperforms existing bounds with small sample sizes

Simulations confirm the theoretical improvements

Abstract

This paper studies the decentralized learning of tree-structured Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) from noisy data. In decentralized learning, data set is distributed across different machines (sensors), and GGMs are widely used to model complex networks such as gene regulatory networks and social networks. The proposed decentralized learning uses the Chow-Liu algorithm for estimating the tree-structured GGM. In previous works, upper bounds on the probability of incorrect tree structure recovery were given mostly without any practical noise for simplification. While this paper investigates the effects of three common types of noisy channels: Gaussian, Erasure, and binary symmetric channel. For Gaussian channel case, to satisfy the failure probability upper bound $\delta > 0$ in recovering a $d$-node tree structure, our proposed theorem requires only $\mathcal{O}(\log(\frac{d}{\delta}))$ samples for the smallest sample size ($n$) comparing to the previous literature \cite{Nikolakakis} with $\mathcal{O}(\log^4(\frac{d}{\delta}))$ samples by using the positive correlation coefficient assumption that is used in some important works in the literature. Moreover, the approximately bounded Gaussian random variable assumption does not appear in \cite{Nikolakakis}. Given some knowledge about the tree structure, the proposed Algorithmic Bound will achieve obviously better performance with small sample size (e.g., $< 2000$) comparing with formulaic bounds. Finally, we validate our theoretical results by performing simulations on synthetic data sets.