TL;DR
This paper empirically demonstrates that long social ties tend to persist and serve as crucial bridges in networks, challenging prior theories that suggested they dissolve quickly, and introduces a new model explaining their longevity.
Contribution
The study provides empirical evidence that long ties are more persistent than previously thought and develops a novel cost-benefit model combined with machine learning to explain their stability.
Findings
Long ties are more likely to persist than other social ties.
Many long ties serve as continuous social bridges without local embedding.
A new model explains the high benefit and persistence of long ties.
Abstract
Long ties, the social ties that bridge different communities, are widely believed to play crucial roles in spreading novel information in social networks. However, some existing network theories and prediction models indicate that long ties might dissolve quickly or eventually become redundant, thus putting into question the long-term value of long ties. Our empirical analysis of real-world dynamic networks shows that contrary to such reasoning, long ties are more likely to persist than other social ties, and that many of them constantly function as social bridges without being embedded in local networks. Using a novel cost-benefit analysis model combined with machine learning, we show that long ties are highly beneficial, which instinctively motivates people to expend extra effort to maintain them. This partly explains why long ties are more persistent than what has been suggested by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
