Competitive X-ray and Optical Cooling in the Collisionless Shocks of WR 140
A. M. T. Pollock, M. F. Corcoran, I. R. Stevens, C. M. P. Russell, K., Hamaguchi, P. M. Williams, A. F. J. Moffat, G. Weigelt, V. Shenavrin, N. D., Richardson, D. Espinoza, S. A. Drake

TL;DR
This study analyzes 20 years of X-ray and optical data from WR 140, revealing how colliding stellar winds produce variable X-ray emission, and provides insights into the shock physics, system morphology, and dust formation in this binary system.
Contribution
It offers the first comprehensive long-term observational analysis of WR 140's colliding-wind shocks, linking X-ray variability with optical emission and shock physics.
Findings
X-ray luminosity inversely correlates with stellar separation.
Absorption peaks at inferior conjunction, indicating collisionless shock formation.
Dust formation occurs shortly after periastron within shocked gas.
Abstract
WR 140 is a long-period, highly eccentric Wolf-Rayet star binary system with exceptionally well-determined orbital and stellar parameters. Bright, variable X-ray emission is generated in shocks produced by the collision of the winds of the WC7pd+O5.5fc component stars. We discuss the variations in the context of the colliding-wind model using broad-band spectrometry from the RXTE, SWIFT, and NICER observatories obtained over 20 years and nearly 1000 observations through 3 consecutive 7.94-year orbits including 3 periastron passages. The X-ray luminosity varies as expected with the inverse of the stellar separation over most of the orbit: departures near periastron are produced when cooling shifts to excess optical emission in CIII in particular. We use X-ray absorption to estimate mass-loss rates for both stars and to constrain the system morphology. The absorption maximum…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
