Is backreaction in cosmology a relativistic effect? On the need for an extension of Newton's theory to non-Euclidean topologies
Quentin Vigneron

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether cosmological backreaction is inherently a relativistic effect by exploring how non-Euclidean topologies can induce backreaction effects even within a Newtonian framework, challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It extends the Buchert-Ehlers theorem to include non-Euclidean topologies, showing that backreaction can be non-zero in Newtonian-like theories with such topologies.
Findings
Backreaction can be non-zero in a Newtonian theory on non-Euclidean topologies.
The implication that backreaction is purely relativistic is not necessarily valid.
The constructed theory remains heuristic and needs further justification from GR limits.
Abstract
Cosmological backreaction corresponds to the effect of inhomogeneities of structure on the global expansion of the Universe. The main question surrounding this phenomenon is whether or not it is important enough to lead to measurable effects on the scale factor evolution eventually explaining its acceleration or the Hubble tension. One of the most important result on this subject is the Buchert-Ehlers theorem (Buchert \& Ehlers, 1997) stating that backreaction is exactly zero when calculated using Newton's theory of gravitation, which may not be the case in general relativity. It is generally said that this result implies that backreaction is a purely relativistic effect. We will show that this is not necessarily the case, in the sense that this implication does not apply to a universe which is still well described by Newton's theory on small scales but has a non-Euclidean topology. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
