Cryptocurrencies and the Future of Money
Matheus R. Grasselli, Alexander Lipton

TL;DR
This paper reviews various cryptocurrencies, analyzing their economic properties, and proposes a macroeconomic model that incorporates different types of digital currencies, highlighting their potential roles in future monetary systems.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification of cryptocurrencies based on economic properties and introduces a macroeconomic framework integrating these diverse digital currencies.
Findings
Pure-asset coins resemble commodities like gold.
Central bank digital currencies are liabilities of central banks.
Stable coins vary in economic complexity and use cases.
Abstract
We review different classes of cryptocurrencies with emphasis on their economic properties. Pure-asset coins such as Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple are characterized by not being a liability of any economic agent and most resemble commodities such as gold. Central bank digital currencies, at the other end of the economic spectrum, are liabilities of a Central Bank and most resemble cash. In between, there exist a range of so-called stable coins, with varying degrees of economic complexity. We use balance sheet operations to highlight the properties of each class of cryptocurrency and their potential uses. In addition, we propose the basic structure for a macroeconomic model incorporating all the different types of cryptocurrencies under consideration.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
