Comparative Analysis of Cryptographic Key Management Systems
Levgeniia Kuzminykh, Bogdan Ghita, Stavros Shiaeles

TL;DR
This paper compares five cryptographic key management systems, evaluating their features, security, and performance to guide organizations in selecting suitable solutions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of key management tools based on implementation complexity, security, and technical performance, aiding enterprise decision-making.
Findings
Hashicorp Vault is most suitable for small businesses.
Vault demonstrated the best response time and network efficiency.
The systems vary in security features and ease of implementation.
Abstract
Managing cryptographic keys can be a complex task for an enterprise and particularly difficult to scale when an increasing number of users and applications need to be managed. In order to address scalability issues, typical IT infrastructures employ key management systems that are able to handle a large number of encryption keys and associate them with the authorized requests. Given their necessity, recent years have witnessed a variety of key management systems, aligned with the features, quality, price and security needs of specific organisations. While the spectrum of such solutions is welcome and demonstrates the expanding nature of the market, it also makes it time consuming for IT managers to identify the appropriate system for their respective company needs. This paper provides a list of key management tools which include a minimum set of features, such as availability of secure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
