Symbols as a Lingua Franca for Bridging Human-AI Chasm for Explainable and Advisable AI Systems
Subbarao Kambhampati, Sarath Sreedharan, Mudit Verma, Yantian Zha, Lin, Guan

TL;DR
This paper advocates for the use of symbols as a universal language to improve human-AI interaction and explainability, emphasizing the importance of symbolic interfaces for transparent and advisory AI systems.
Contribution
It highlights the need for symbolic interfaces in AI for better human interaction and discusses future research directions for integrating symbols into AI systems.
Findings
Symbols are crucial for human-AI interaction and explanation.
Current AI systems lack a universal symbolic interface.
Research directions are proposed for symbolic integration in AI.
Abstract
Despite the surprising power of many modern AI systems that often learn their own representations, there is significant discontent about their inscrutability and the attendant problems in their ability to interact with humans. While alternatives such as neuro-symbolic approaches have been proposed, there is a lack of consensus on what they are about. There are often two independent motivations (i) symbols as a lingua franca for human-AI interaction and (ii) symbols as system-produced abstractions used by the AI system in its internal reasoning. The jury is still out on whether AI systems will need to use symbols in their internal reasoning to achieve general intelligence capabilities. Whatever the answer there is, the need for (human-understandable) symbols in human-AI interaction seems quite compelling. Symbols, like emotions, may well not be sine qua non for intelligence per se, but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
