Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Marginalisation over redshift distribution uncertainties using ranking of discrete realisations
Juan P. Cordero, Ian Harrison, Richard P. Rollins, G. M. Bernstein, S., L. Bridle, A. Alarcon, O. Alves, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, H. Camacho, A., Campos, A. Choi, J. DeRose, S. Dodelson, K. Eckert, T. F. Eifler, S. Everett,, X. Fang, O. Friedrich, D. Gruen, R. A. Gruendl

TL;DR
This paper introduces hyperrank, a novel method for marginalising redshift distribution uncertainties in weak lensing surveys, improving accuracy and computational efficiency over previous parametric models, demonstrated with DES Year 3 data.
Contribution
The paper presents hyperrank, a new non-parametric approach for marginalising over redshift uncertainties using discrete samples, enhancing flexibility and efficiency in cosmological analyses.
Findings
Hyperrank accurately marginalises over redshift uncertainties in simulations.
The method improves computational efficiency compared to traditional models.
Validation shows hyperrank's results are consistent with simpler marginalisation techniques.
Abstract
Cosmological information from weak lensing surveys is maximised by dividing source galaxies into tomographic sub-samples for which the redshift distributions are estimated. Uncertainties on these redshift distributions must be correctly propagated into the cosmological results. We present hyperrank, a new method for marginalising over redshift distribution uncertainties in cosmological analyses, using discrete samples from the space of all possible redshift distributions. This is demonstrated in contrast to previous highly simplified parametric models of the redshift distribution uncertainty. In hyperrank the set of proposed redshift distributions is ranked according to a small (in this work between one and four) number of summary values, which are then sampled along with other nuisance parameters and cosmological parameters in the Monte Carlo chain used for inference. This can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Statistical and numerical algorithms
