
TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which the endomorphism operad of a comonoid forms a clone in braided monoidal categories, revealing that cocommutativity is not guaranteed.
Contribution
It provides an explicit example showing that the endomorphism operad being a clone does not imply cocommutativity of the comonoid.
Findings
Endomorphism operad of a comonoid need not be a clone in braided categories.
Cocommutativity of a comonoid is not implied by its endomorphism operad being a clone.
Explicit example demonstrating the non-equivalence of these properties.
Abstract
The fact that the cocommutative comonoids in a symmetric monoidal category form the best possible approximation by a cartesian category is revisited when the original category is only braided monoidal. This leads to the question when the endomorphism operad of a comonoid is a clone (a Lawvere theory). By giving an explicit example, we prove that this does not imply that the comonoid is cocommutative.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
