Description of Corner Cases in Automated Driving: Goals and Challenges
Daniel Bogdoll, Jasmin Breitenstein, Florian Heidecker, Maarten Bieshaar, Bernhard Sick, Tim Fingscheidt, J. Marius Z\"ollner

TL;DR
This paper discusses the importance of identifying and describing corner cases in automated driving to improve machine learning models and system robustness, highlighting the challenges in creating machine-interpretable descriptions.
Contribution
It provides an overview of the goals and challenges in developing machine-interpretable descriptions of corner cases in automated driving systems.
Findings
Limited CC data hampers ML model training.
Better understanding of CC can improve offline dataset analysis.
Enhanced descriptions can lead to improved online system performance.
Abstract
Scaling the distribution of automated vehicles requires handling various unexpected and possibly dangerous situations, termed corner cases (CC). Since many modules of automated driving systems are based on machine learning (ML), CC are an essential part of the data for their development. However, there is only a limited amount of CC data in large-scale data collections, which makes them challenging in the context of ML. With a better understanding of CC, offline applications, e.g., dataset analysis, and online methods, e.g., improved performance of automated driving systems, can be improved. While there are knowledge-based descriptions and taxonomies for CC, there is little research on machine-interpretable descriptions. In this extended abstract, we will give a brief overview of the challenges and goals of such a description.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
