A proactive malicious software identification approach for digital forensic examiners
Muhammad Ali, Stavros Shiaeles, Nathan Clarke, Dimitrios Kontogeorgis

TL;DR
This paper proposes a proactive approach for digital forensic investigators to identify malware by analyzing its behavior across different Windows OS versions, improving detection beyond traditional AV tools.
Contribution
It introduces a method to correlate malware behavior with OS artifacts, aiding in the early detection of new and unknown malware.
Findings
Malware exhibits distinct behaviors on different Windows versions.
Correlation with OS artifacts can improve malware detection accuracy.
The approach reduces reliance on traditional AV signatures.
Abstract
Digital investigators often get involved with cases, which seemingly point the responsibility to the person to which the computer belongs, but after a thorough examination malware is proven to be the cause, causing loss of precious time. Whilst Anti-Virus (AV) software can assist the investigator in identifying the presence of malware, with the increase in zero-day attacks and errors that exist in AV tools, this is something that cannot be relied upon. The aim of this paper is to investigate the behaviour of malware upon various Windows operating system versions in order to determine and correlate the relationship between malicious software and OS artifacts. This will enable an investigator to be more efficient in identifying the presence of new malware and provide a starting point for further investigation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
