Reliable stellar abundances of individual stars with the MUSE integral-field spectrograph
Zixian Wang (Purmortal), Michael R. Hayden, Sanjib Sharma, Maosheng, Xiang, Yuan-Sen Ting, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Boquan Chen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a machine learning approach to derive precise stellar parameters from MUSE spectroscopic data by adapting a model originally used for LAMOST, enabling automated analysis of dense star fields.
Contribution
The authors adapt the Data-Driven Payne model for MUSE data, achieving high-precision stellar labels and enabling automated analysis of dense stellar fields in large MUSE surveys.
Findings
Achieved better than 75K precision in $T_{\rm eff}$
Achieved 0.15 dex precision in $\log g$
Achieved 0.1 dex precision in multiple element abundances
Abstract
We present a novel approach to deriving stellar labels for stars observed in MUSE fields making use of data-driven machine learning methods. Taking advantage of the comparable spectral properties (resolution, wavelength coverage) of the LAMOST and MUSE instruments, we adopt the Data-Driven Payne (DD-Payne) model used on LAMOST observations and apply it to stars observed in MUSE fields. Remarkably, in spite of instrumental differences, according to the cross-validation of 27 LAMOST-MUSE common stars, we are able to determine stellar labels with precision better than 75K in , 0.15 dex in , and 0.1 dex in abundances of [Fe/H], [Mg/Fe], [Si/Fe], [Ti/Fe], [C/Fe], [Ni/Fe] and [Cr/Fe] for current MUSE observations over a parameter range of 3800<<7000 K, -1.5<[Fe/H]<0.5 dex. To date, MUSE has been used to target 13,000 fields across the southern sky since it…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
