Design and Results of ICCMA 2021
Jean-Marie Lagniez, Emmanuel Lonca, Jean-Guy Mailly, Julien Rossit

TL;DR
This paper details the design, rules, benchmark selection, and results of ICCMA 2021, a competition that systematically compares algorithms for reasoning in abstract argumentation since 2015.
Contribution
It introduces the design and methodology of ICCMA 2021, including new rules and benchmark selection, and presents the competition results.
Findings
Comparison of multiple algorithms for argumentation reasoning
Identification of top-performing algorithms
Insights into current state of computational argumentation
Abstract
Since 2015, the International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation (ICCMA) provides a systematic comparison of the different algorithms for solving some classical reasoning problems in the domain of abstract argumentation. This paper discusses the design of the Fourth International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation. We describe the rules of the competition and the benchmark selection method that we used. After a brief presentation of the competitors, we give an overview of the results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies
