Using gradient-based algorithms to determine ground state energies on a quantum computer
Tomislav Piskor, Florian G. Eich, Jan-Michael Reiner, Sebastian, Zanker, Nicolas Vogt, Michael Marthaler, and Frank Wilhelm-Mauch

TL;DR
This paper explores the effectiveness of gradient-based algorithms, specifically finite-difference and parameter-shift rules, in optimizing the variational Hamiltonian Ansatz for ground state energy estimation on noisy quantum computers, using simulations of simple circuits and Hubbard models.
Contribution
It analyzes how shot noise and device noise impact gradient estimation methods in variational quantum algorithms for ground state energy calculations.
Findings
Gradient estimation methods are affected differently by noise.
Simulations show the impact of noise on optimization accuracy.
The study provides insights into noise mitigation for quantum variational algorithms.
Abstract
Variational algorithms are promising candidates to be implemented on near-term quantum computers. The variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) is a prominent example, where a parametrized trial state of the quantum mechanical wave function is optimized to obtain the ground state energy. In our work, we investigate the variational Hamiltonian Ansatz (VHA), where the trial state is given by a non-interacting reference state modified by unitary rotations using generators that are part of the Hamiltonian describing the system. The lowest energy is obtained by optimizing the angles of those unitary rotations. A standard procedure to optimize the variational parameters is to use gradient-based algorithms. However, shot noise and the intrinsic noise of the quantum device affect the evaluation of the required gradients. We studied how different methods for obtaining the gradient, specifically the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
