Challenges of Driver Drowsiness Prediction: The Remaining Steps to Implementation
Emma Perkins, Chiranjibi Sitaula, Michael Burke, Faezeh Marzbanrad

TL;DR
This paper reviews the challenges and current solutions in driver drowsiness detection, highlighting issues like accuracy, intrusiveness, and data inconsistencies that hinder real-world implementation.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive survey of existing methods, identifies key barriers to deployment, and suggests steps needed for effective on-road driver drowsiness monitoring.
Findings
Hybrid models outperform single-method approaches
Current systems face late detection and privacy issues
Data collection and labeling inconsistencies hinder progress
Abstract
Driver drowsiness has caused a large number of serious injuries and deaths on public roads and incurred billions of taxpayer dollars in costs. Hence, monitoring of drowsiness is critical to reduce this burden on society. This paper surveys the broad range of solutions proposed to address the challenges of driver drowsiness, and identifies the key steps required for successful implementation. Although some commercial products already exist, with vehicle-based methods most commonly implemented by automotive manufacturers, these systems may not have the level of accuracy required to properly predict and monitor drowsiness. State-of-the-art models use physiological, behavioural and vehicle-based methods to detect drowsiness, with hybrid methods emerging as a superior approach. Current setbacks to implementing these methods include late detection, intrusiveness and subject diversity. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
