Adversarial Attacks against Deep Learning Based Power Control in Wireless Communications

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that adversarial machine learning techniques can significantly disrupt deep learning-based power control in wireless communications, outperforming simple scaling attacks and remaining effective under uncertainty.

Contribution

It introduces adversarial attack strategies against DNN-based power allocation in wireless systems, highlighting their effectiveness and robustness compared to baseline methods.

Findings

Adversarial attacks greatly reduce communication rates.

Attacks outperform simple input scaling methods.

Robustness of attacks persists despite channel estimation errors.

Abstract

We consider adversarial machine learning based attacks on power allocation where the base station (BS) allocates its transmit power to multiple orthogonal subcarriers by using a deep neural network (DNN) to serve multiple user equipments (UEs). The DNN that corresponds to a regression model is trained with channel gains as the input and returns transmit powers as the output. While the BS allocates the transmit powers to the UEs to maximize rates for all UEs, there is an adversary that aims to minimize these rates. The adversary may be an external transmitter that aims to manipulate the inputs to the DNN by interfering with the pilot signals that are transmitted to measure the channel gain. Alternatively, the adversary may be a rogue UE that transmits fabricated channel estimates to the BS. In both cases, the adversary carefully crafts adversarial perturbations to manipulate the inputs to the DNN of the BS subject to an upper bound on the strengths of these perturbations. We consider the attacks targeted on a single UE or all UEs. We compare these attacks with a benchmark, where the adversary scales down the input to the DNN. We show that the adversarial attacks are much more effective than the benchmark attack in terms of reducing the rate of communications. We also show that adversarial attacks are robust to the uncertainty at the adversary including the erroneous knowledge of channel gains and the potential errors in exercising the attacks exactly as specified.