Sigmoids behaving badly: why they usually cannot predict the future as well as they seem to promise
Anders Sandberg, Stuart Armstrong, Rebecca Gorman, Rei England

TL;DR
Sigmoid models often perform poorly in future predictions unless data spans the entire growth cycle, due to inherent theoretical limitations in parameter identifiability, making forecasting unreliable.
Contribution
This paper analyzes the limitations of sigmoid models in time series forecasting and proposes practical methods to improve their predictive reliability.
Findings
Retrospective fit of sigmoid models is often impressive.
Future prediction accuracy is limited unless full data range is available.
Theoretical reasons explain the difficulty in forecasting with sigmoids.
Abstract
Sigmoids (AKA s-curves or logistic curves) are commonly used in a diverse spectrum of disciplines as models for time-varying phenomena showing initial acceleration followed by slowing: technology diffusion, cumulative cases of an epidemic, population growth towards a carrying capacity, etc. Existing work demonstrates that retrospective fit of data is often impressive. We show that in time series data, the future fit tends to be poor unless the data covers the entire range from before to after the inflection point. We discuss the theoretical reasons for this: the growth data provides little information about the damping term (and vice-versa). As a consequence, forecasting with sigmoids tends to be very unreliable. We suggest some practical approaches to improving the viability of forecasting sigmoid models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research · Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
