The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): A complete census of X-ray properties of Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam weak lensing shear-selected clusters in the eFEDS footprint
Miriam E. Ramos-Ceja, M. Oguri, S. Miyazaki, V. Ghirardini, I. Chiu,, N. Okabe, A. Liu, T. Schrabback, D. Akino, Y. E. Bahar, E. Bulbul, N. Clerc,, J. Comparat, S. Grandis, M. Klein, Y.-T. Lin, A. Merloni, I. Mitsuishi, H., Miyatake, S. More, K. Nandra, A. J. Nishizawa, N. Ota

TL;DR
This study compares X-ray and shear-selected galaxy clusters in the eFEDS footprint, demonstrating their consistent properties and the completeness of X-ray selected samples for cosmological studies.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparison between X-ray and shear-selected clusters in the eFEDS survey, confirming the consistency of their scaling relations and the completeness of X-ray selection.
Findings
X-ray and shear-selected clusters have consistent luminosity-mass relations
Most shear-selected clusters are detected in X-rays or are below detection limits
A significant fraction of shear-selected clusters are in superclusters
Abstract
The eFEDS survey is a proof-of-concept mini-survey designed to demonstrate the survey science capabilities of SRG/eROSITA. It covers an area of 140 square degrees where 542 galaxy clusters have been detected out to a redshift of 1.3. The eFEDS field is partly embedded in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP) S19A data release, which covers 510 square degrees, containing approximately 36 million galaxies. This galaxy catalogue is used to construct a sample of 180 shear-selected galaxy clusters. In the common area to both surveys, about 90 square degrees, we investigate the effects of selection methods in the galaxy cluster detection by comparing the X-ray selected, eFEDS, and the shear-selected, HSC-SSP S19A, galaxy cluster samples. There are 25 shear-selected clusters in the eFEDS footprint. The relation between X-ray bolometric luminosity and weak-lensing mass is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
