Limitations of the Invertible-Map Equivalences
Anuj Dawar, Erich Gr\"adel, Moritz Lichter

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates fundamental limitations of invertible-map equivalences in distinguishing certain graph structures, showing they cannot fully characterize graph isomorphism or capture polynomial time in fixed-point logic with linear algebra.
Contribution
It unifies previous results to prove that invertible-map equivalences over all primes cannot fully identify graph isomorphism or characterize polynomial time.
Findings
Invertible-map equivalences do not coincide with graph isomorphism.
Such equivalences cannot capture polynomial time.
Limits of linear-algebraic logic in graph isomorphism testing.
Abstract
This note draws conclusions that arise by combining two recent papers, by Anuj Dawar, Erich Gr\"adel, and Wied Pakusa, published at ICALP 2019 and by Moritz Lichter, published at LICS 2021. In both papers, the main technical results rely on the combinatorial and algebraic analysis of the invertible-map equivalences on certain variants of Cai-F\"urer-Immerman (CFI) structures. These -equivalences, for a number and a set of primes~, refine the well-known Weisfeiler-Leman equivalences used in algorithms for graph isomorphism. The intuition is that two graphs cannot be distinguished by iterative refinements of equivalences on -tuples defined via linear operators on vector spaces over fields of characteristic . In the first paper it has been shown, using considerable algebraic machinery, that for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
